<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Size of the derivatives market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://langabi.name/blog/2008/10/17/size-of-the-derivatives-market/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://langabi.name/blog/2008/10/17/size-of-the-derivatives-market</link>
	<description>Paul Cook's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tompainejr</title>
		<link>http://langabi.name/blog/2008/10/17/size-of-the-derivatives-market#comment-17585</link>
		<dc:creator>tompainejr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://langabi.name/blog/2008/10/17/size-of-the-derivatives-market#comment-17585</guid>
		<description>The Bank for International Settlements announced a total derivative market of $1.14 quadrillion last summer and I'm anxiously looking for an update.  In the December 2008 issue of "The Atlantic" I found hope that this scheme would be exposed and remedied.  Gao Xiqing, President of the China Investment Corporation, said, "If you look at every one of these [derivative] products, they make sense.   But in aggregate, they are bullshit.  They are crap.  They serve to cheat people."  He added, "I think we should  do an overhaul and say, 'Let's get rid of 90% of the derivatives.'  Of course, that's going to be very unpopular, because many people will lose jobs."  He went on to say, "We can get all the relevant people together and think up what people are calling a second Bretton Woods system, like the first Bretton Woods system did."

Sad to say that some months after this interview it was announced that China was entering the derivative business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bank for International Settlements announced a total derivative market of $1.14 quadrillion last summer and I&#8217;m anxiously looking for an update.  In the December 2008 issue of &#8220;The Atlantic&#8221; I found hope that this scheme would be exposed and remedied.  Gao Xiqing, President of the China Investment Corporation, said, &#8220;If you look at every one of these [derivative] products, they make sense.   But in aggregate, they are bullshit.  They are crap.  They serve to cheat people.&#8221;  He added, &#8220;I think we should  do an overhaul and say, &#8216;Let&#8217;s get rid of 90% of the derivatives.&#8217;  Of course, that&#8217;s going to be very unpopular, because many people will lose jobs.&#8221;  He went on to say, &#8220;We can get all the relevant people together and think up what people are calling a second Bretton Woods system, like the first Bretton Woods system did.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sad to say that some months after this interview it was announced that China was entering the derivative business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
